predator

Predatory Neurotype
prerequisite knowledge:
neurodiversity/ neurodivergence
narcissism/ cluster A/b/c
evolution of Human mind
objective vs subjective reality
INTRO

This is a snapshot of predatory neurotype analysis, a more in depth view will follow in full research.
The neurodiversity approach to the predatory neurotype differs significantly from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–5). DSM methodology is deeply settled within neurotypical and creationist perspectives on reality. Its term ‘narcissism’ is a euphemism shaming the predator in the social neurotypical reality as self centered, and dangerous, while inaccurately shelfing assertive empathic neurotypes as ‘narcissist’. The euphemistic, relative ‘narcissism’ is anecdotal in its encapsulated meaning to the socially wired neurotype, and its side dish of creationism, hidden behind the concept of ‘personality’ (NPD). Ensuing terms in the DSM terminology, the sociopath and the psychopath, only stress the distance away from the ‘normal’ center of what is the social (or anti social) and religious (good or evil) norm. The dangers of such skewed, seemingly leveled approach to cluster b lie in the perception of these sophisticated predators that freely roam our societies. This is evident through my research of online environments built by prolific narcissistic authors who provide their experiences via interactions with their readers. It is especially evident in social perception of predatory neurotype in politics, compartmentalized as evil, morally corrupt, or a product of social injustice or familial abuse. None of these are accurately describing the true nature of the predatory neurotype. The labels ascribed to ‘narcissists’ are false, because they are anecdotally shallow, and subjectively neurotypical.

DSM vs NEURODIVERGENCE

1. Clusters a/b/c

Clusters a/b/c are classified as personality disorders in the DSM, without any relation between them, nor is there an indication of its cause. The neurodiversity approach lays out a neurological connection or similarity, which it indeed is, a spectrum. This is why the second hypothesis is much more cogent.

2. Abuse theory

The abuse hypothesis in the DSM Narcissisic Personality Disorder theory is objectively illogical. In a predatory NT family that consists of 1 narc parent + 1 co-dp parent and 1narc child, 1 co-dp child, 1 borderline child, and 1 empath child, does not add up: 1+ abuse=1, 1+ abuse=0.5, 1+abuse=0.5, 1+abuse=0.

The abuse theory as presented by the DSM hangs in the vacuum again, with no connection to neurological reality among the clusters, a placebo explanation for the missing scientific data.

The neurological connection between the three clusters, and within each cluster, is important to note as a basis for further exploration of cluster b. This will be a singular focus of my research, the deconstruction of the genetic-neurological landscape, the formation of emotions, and the engine behind it all, the DNA.

CLUSTER B

Predatory neurotype is the most primitive of all neurotypes. See Behavior for more on neurodiversity. In modern Homo sapiens genome it is non native, invasive, and parasitic, and has no chance of evolving any further. Its existence manifests as a separate, parasitic ‘creature’ identity (or DSM personality) besides a human identity, which is split into one or more identities (cluster a). The parasitic identity is devoid of all emotional functions, replaced with predatory instincts.

The Cluster B Spectrum

Because predatory neurotype is a genetic disorder (full analysis in research), it will consist of a variety of predators within the same spectrum, split along the edges of human and predatory identities: the dependent, the avoidant, the borderline, the schizoid, the schizotypal, the dissociative, the paranoid, the histrionic, the psychotic, the narcissistic, the antisocial, and the psychopathic. These are of course all DSM neurotypical terms descriptive of how the differences relate to the neurotypical “normal” person, and they always seem to shift in the next versions of the manual. These labels are largely irrelevant in the Neurodiversity analysis. I will still use some of them to analyze the whole spectrum. While the DSM separates the three clusters as unrelated, it is the opposite. Not only are they related, they overlap in numerous ways. This is the most important finding from within the ‘grassroots’ analysis.

The product of identity splitting, slicing, deleting or multiplying is what matters in this analysis. The human identity may be either intact, functioning with some side effects such as dissociation, obsessive compulsivity, anxiety, psychosis, paranoia, etc. In fact some of these are inaccurately named as separate disorders, while all they are, are effects of identity disturbance. It is an obvious inconsistency in the DSM, which confuses disorder with comobirdity. This is because DSM does not identify the roots of cluster b spectrum correctly. A correct categorization lies in the ratio between split identities, as printed by DNA. The human identity may be mostly intact, partially present or almost or entirely erased, overwhelmed by the predatory identity. The splitting of human psyche along the edges of the three clusters gives us an unprecedented objective view of the elements that compose our identity.

The greater the predator, the stronger the predatory identity in ratio to the human identity. Tentatively, a greater predator will contain 1-10% of human identity, and 90-99% of predatory identity. A midrange predator will contain 10-50% of human identity and 50-90% of predatory identity. A borderline will contain 50% of each identity. A codependent may contain from 1-50% of predatory identity and 50-99% of human identity.

More about why and how the predatory identity behaves in relation to the human identity in full research.

The Neurotype & Misconceptions

The Neurodivergence of the predatory neurotype is evident in how it forms its own social structures within larger society. In the DSM version, the predator is seen as a sole actor, penetrating mostly neurotypical society on the quest for more empathic victims. While this is also true, a predator rarely exists on his own. Larger predatory networks built by the predatory NT are invisible, or mislabeled as mafias, radicalized sections of society, criminal gangs, far right wing parties or fascist governments.

Another manifestation of the predatory neurotype infestation in the Western world is an absence of strong modern human male archetypes, positive male leaders and fathers, substituted with the illusion of strength of the predatory white male. As a consequence, Western women are left either entangled with predatory males or with little choice. The consequences of the gender imbalance are staggering to the social structure: single motherhood, sex industry, misogyny, etc.

The predatory neurotype starts to become more apparent in how it functions within its own family and social systems. Because the neurotype is genetic, a predatory family will contain most or all types of predatory types, very rarely a healthy empath. It will contain a greater, a midrange narcissist, or a lesser narcissist(1), a borderline, and a codependent. It will contain also cluster a and cluster c, a schizoid or an avoidant, and all the rest in multiple variations.

Predators will ensnare and abuse mostly each other within its own kind. It is a misconception that predatory NT seeks only empathic targets, while it takes place due to the lack of self awareness and knowledge of neurodiversity, an empath is a rare prize long term. Predatory neurotype will always choose it’s own kind, because for most it is simply too difficult to keep the neurodivergence hidden. A healthy empath won’t perform the way the predator requires to meet his needs. This is the reason so many predators cycle their victims quickly, devaluing and discarding them, and moving onto next targets. Empathic and neurotypical neurotypes do not behave the predatory neurotype is used to in their family and social system.

Which is the cycle of ensnarement and abuse. Abuse, contrary to popular belief, is a valued currency for the predatory NT, it equals negative fuel (2). Because predatory NT experiences mostly negative emotions, and doesn’t experience emotional pain, abuse is the only language it understands. All predatory NTs crave abuse, its potency is high causing sexual arousal.

The codependent, and the borderline, those with lower percentages of predatory identity, experience both positive and negative emotions, and predatory instincts depending on which identity surfaces. The codependent belongs on the cluster b spectrum, but because its human identity resembles the empathic identity so well, it is mistaken for a martyr empath who can’t help but incessantly give, forgetting its own needs. The reality is the codependent is a predator who ensnares a greater predator with its strong empathic identity, by giving, it meets its own fuel needs. It forgets its own existence because it really doesn’t exist when the predatory identity surfaces. A greater predator is fooled by co-dp’s empathic identity to the point he thinks he ensnared an empath, the reality is the ensnarement is mutual and parallel, and very intense. So are the devaluation, discard, and follow up hoovers.

It is a misconception that a codependent is an empath, ensnared to heal childhood wounds incurred by the predatory family of origin. A codependent ensnared and has been ensnared because of its own predatory identity, however small, which requires fuel just the same as a greater predator. The codependent more than any other predator ensnares via a victim’s cloak. It will cry victim, complain of injuries, usually self inflicted or via the seduction of a greater predator. It sees itself as an injured, wounded little child.

Even the tiny 1% of predatory identity in a co-dp can bring enormous damage to its victims it is as malign as the greater’s 99% if not more because it is camouflaged behind an empathic identity. A majority of predatory neurotype victims are predatory themselves, it is unlikely that another neurotype is ensnared long term. This is because an empath who’s been raised in a non predatory family, will not accept abuse, immoral or unethical behavior in any way, shape or form..

The borderline is really schizoid cluster a, evenly split in the middle, one of the identities is the predatory or the ‘creature’ identity, the same one that overwhelms a greater predator. It is very similar in behavior and identity constitution to the codependent. Both tend to flock to greater predators, circling them thirsty for his attention, and fuel be it positive or negative. They tend to become greater predator’s flying monkeys, fighting for scraps of his attention, passing information between each other, gossiping, etc. Because the greater doesn’t pay much heed to them, they become more and more despearate, and they’ll do anything at his behest to gain his approval, and score brownie points. Borderlines are the most conflicted of all cluster b variations. The half & half constitution is a battlefield between the empathic and the predatory identities. In female form, borderlines are deadly to their male victims. It doesn’t mean that a borderline or a codependent are a milder or a benign version of a narcissist, they contain the exact same predatory identity and it is as malign. The difference is its surface time offset by its human identity surface time.

Predatory Social Structures

The greater’s inner circle, outer circle, non intimate and intimate secondary sources, flying monkeys, butterflies and crows .. are all predatory neurotypes: greaters, midrangers, lessers, borderlines, and codependents – in that order, bound to the greatest predator by their own fuel needs, character traits and residual benefits ..  It is a cohesive, parasitic, symbiotic structure. It is a misconception that what holds the structure cohesively together is the greater’s personal magnetism and charm. The glue that locks it in place are the predatory prime aims of each and every predator in the structure. The predatory web tightens by way of exchange of fuel, residual benefits, and character traits. It’s clearer in online environments where you will often read lesser predators who seem to sound exactly like the greater predator as they adopt his writing style, speech mannerisms, phrases etc. This is because the lesser predators have fed on greater’s fuel, in essence becoming his little mirrors, which creates an illusion of a vast spider web, it’s as if the greater is everywhere and everyone. This is how they can be easily spotted & avoided. The greater predator tightens the web by controlling the lesser predators using control tools from his ‘devil’s toolkit’, balancing them with the degrees of access to his inner circle/ sanctuary.

Each predator within the pyramidal structure will have its own smaller structure or matrix composed with mostly predatory neurotypes, that will intertwine with each other, composing larger social structures, e.g. Red States in the US electorate. If you look at the US electoral map, you’ll see swaths of red patches denoting the lair of the American predatory tribes. It’s clear that there are no empaths in predatory matrices/ pyramidal fiefdoms.  There are no modern empathic homo sapiens peacefully cohabiting these regions. There will be neurotypical/ normal people as they will be the enablers of predators because of their own negative emotional composition (expanded in full research: the evolution of human mind).

Further I’ll expand on each subject presented in this snapshot, concluding it with an assertion that the predatory neurotype forms a distinct human species within a larger modern society.

 

all © copyrights reserved

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.